HELLOS! We are The GEOGraphy Group from class 203. [:
Our group consist of CANDYchun (02), WENQImak (10) and NERISSAtan (17).
Increasing prices-land use is partly determined by opportunity cost and mechanism. Land is very valuable in cities like
Increasing land supply
Land reclamation-
Maximizing land use
Conserving of land- nature reserves are our natural heritage. An example, central catchment area from Bukit Timah Nature Reserve. Land conservation reserves land for future development.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Land Reclamation in Singapore
Reasons for Land Reclamation
Large-scale land reclamation has been undertaken in different parts of Singapore since the 1960s. This is necessary because of
More land has been made available for
By 1990, the total land area of Singapore was 633km square. This was an increase of 51.5km square, which made up 8.9% the total land area. With continuing land reclamation, land area in Singapore will increase by about another 100km square by the year 2030. There are, however, constraints as to how much more land the country can reclaim. Two limiting factors have to be considered.
Method of Land Reclamation
The landfill mothod is used to reclaim land from the coast and the swamps in Singapore. It is also used in reclamation works involving the merging of islands. One such project is the amalgamation of Pulau Sakra and Pulau Bakau into one big island called Pulau Sakara, which is ten times the size of the two former islands.
In the early years, the fill materials evacuated from the hills in Bedok, Siglap, Tampines and Jurong were used for filling the reclamation areas. In recent years, sea sand obtained from the seabed is the main source of fill materials for reclamation. The reclamation contractors import the sea sand from the neighbouring countries such as Indonesia.
Increasing prices of land in Singapore
below is an analysis of Singapore’s inhabitants (in ‘000s) with respect to the Singapore department of statistics:-
Year Total Singapore
Residents
2000 — 4,027.9 — 3273.4
2001 — 4,138. — 3,325.9
2002 — 4,176. — 3,382.9
2003 — 4,114.8 — 3,366.9
2004 — 4,166.7 — 3,413.3
2005 — 4,265.8 — 3,467.8
2006 — 4,401.4 — 3,525.9
2007 — 4,588.6 — 3,583.1
2008 — 4,839.4 — 3,642.7
2009 — 4,987.6 — 3,733.9
The inhabitants increase in 2006 over 2005 is a net surge of 135,600
The inhabitants growth in 2007 over 2006 is a net growth of 184,000
The population increase in 2008 over 2007 is a net growth of 250,800
The population increase in 2009 over 2008 is a net increase of 148,200
Based on household size of 3.5 people (Source: Singstat), this would translate into a potential housing demand of: -
2006 – 38,743 units
2007 – 52,571 units
2008 – 71,657 units
2009 – 42,342 units
“In year 2006, we were building about 2,400 new flats. This year, we are
building about 8,000-plus new flats. Supply has gone up to meet demand. That’s
why HDB prices have gone up but they have not gone through the roof.” (Source: Straits times)
MASS Real estate market HDB BEING PROPPED UP
Several of these new stocks were “Built-to-order” flats which often can require 3 to 4 yrs to finish adding to serious shortages of HDB flats.
WHAT IS THE LIKELY Impact?
Devoid of much option, Fussy Singaporeans will be forced to choose undesired locations for instance Punggol which in the past has excess units. Not only that, some may not wait and instead go directly to buy private housing.
HDB flat house owners whose property valuation have increased and are sitting on profits will now consider to sell their HDB and buy a private unit instead. There is currently no shortgage of supplies of Private properties at around 60k units over several years. This is easily 7 to 8 years of supply based on average consumption trend.
Maximizing land use in Singapore
[an image of shop houses in Little India]
Houses are built on top of the shops to
maximize the use of space.
[an image of the skyscrapers in Singapore]
The skyscrapers are built close together,
allowing more space for residential flats to house
a growing population and offers more offices to accommodate
expanding economic activities.
Land reclamation will definitely increase land area for a certain country. With more land, more buildings and infrastructure can be built, and also for other reasons. In
Increasing the price of land is one of the methods to respond to the rising demand for land. The advantages if increasing the price of land include having less people fighting for a particular spot of land in a popular area in the country as only those with a lot of money and can afford the land would but it. The disadvantage will be having the poor people kept far out of popular areas and the rich are just a rare minority.
Land clearance by deforestation is also used as a method to respond to the rising demand for land. Forest take up a lot of space and to many, it is just a big and wide open space of land waiting to be used. Therefore, many of these people resort to deforestation. The obvious advantage is that we get to clear land fast. However, there are many disadvantages to having to resort to deforestation. These include killing many species of plants and animals and destroying their own home. We will also be affected by soil erosion and the disruption in the hydrologic cycle.
REFLECTION
Candy, WenQi, Nerissa
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Doneby: Candy Chun (03)
The only constant in life is change. Everywhere around us are changes. Changes can happen any time, anywhere and on anybody, there is no way to control a change or changes. Thus, change is inevitable.
Since we cannot control or change changes, whoever that is able to adapt faster and build on the change would be therefore the winner of that situation. In the context of land shortage, by being able to adapt and build on the change would mean to be able to think of ways to increase the supply of land and being able to work out the method, allowing more land to be present for other uses. Whoever that loses in the change are those who are unable to control the change, instead, being controlled by the change, leading to overcrowding of that piece of land in that certain country. Thus, winners or losers of changes depend of whomever who is able to adapt and build on the change faster than the other party.
Like what is mentioned, nobody can control change so the only thing that can cause change and the only thing that can be responsible for change is the nature herself. Nature can cause a disaster, changing how a place would look. Nature can cause illnesses, changing how a person might be. Thus nature is the only thing that is responsible for the changes in life. Whatever it is, we just have to try our best to adapt and build on the changes to become winners of changes.
Doneby: Mak Wen Qi (10)
In my opinion, change can be both avoiable and unavoidable. Change itself is decided by one or just happened naturally. Some changes are done by nature, when it starts, we can't stop it and have no choice but to let it take its course.
In this case (for land shortage), it is both avoidable and unavoidable as well. Why? It is because of the high increase in population, resulting in high increase in demand for land. Another reason is that land is not properly taken care of and planned out. This causes shortage of land. We should learn to conserve land for future developements and not act impulsively. For if "you fail to plan, you plan to fail". As saying goes, "Look before you jump."
As for whether who wins or lose in changes, i feel there's no 'win or lose'. It is just that whether one wins or lose depends on which point of view is taken into consideration. From my opinion, the winner is whereby one who thinks before acting, for things are forever changing, and hence we should not be a reckless bull. And as for the one who acts before thinking would be as if digging his or her own's grave. The one gripping the 'winning end' would be those who plan and execute out each idea step by step and so the changes will not be as of a bigger impact when change appeared, compared to the other reckless opponent.
The responsibilty for changes is both no one's and everyone's. As stated before, change is both avoidable and unavoidable, depending on situations. For if one chooses to 'change', the other will have to accept the 'change' and follow (turning it into win-win situation), if not the person who doesnt want to 'change', it will be a lose-win situation, and it will be the person who cannot follow who so called 'loses' and fall back. Changes can also be caused by nature, therefore, my conclusion is changes is both no one's and everyone's responsibility.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Doneby: Nerissa Tan (14)
In my opinion, I really think that land scarcity is a real and scary problem in Singapore. Singapore is a very small country and we have a high population density. With a high population density, we need more land to fit all the people here and provide for their needs. Examples of these are governments having to build more houses for those who live here.
Fortunately, land scarcity is a problem that can actually be solved. The Singapore government has made an effort to solve a part our land scarcity problem by building many high rise buildings instead of having many low buildings that cannot fit many people in the same building. This has definitely helped to lighten the problem of land scarcity here.I believe that land reclamation is inevitable and is possible the only way to solve our land scarcity problem.
In my opinion, change can be both avoiable and unavoidable. Change itself is decided by one or just happened naturally. Some changes are done by nature, when it starts, we can't stop it and have no choice but to let it take its course.
In this case (for land shortage), it is both avoidable and unavoidable as well. Why? It is because of the high increase in population, resulting in high increase in demand for land. Another reason is that land is not properly taken care of and planned out. This causes shortage of land. We should learn to conserve land for future developements and not act impulsively. For if "you fail to plan, you plan to fail". As saying goes, "Look before you jump."
As for whether who wins or lose in changes, i feel there's no 'win or lose'. It is just that whether one wins or lose depends on which point of view is taken into consideration. From my opinion, the winner is whereby one who thinks before acting, for things are forever changing, and hence we should not be a reckless bull. And as for the one who acts before thinking would be as if digging his or her own's grave. The one gripping the 'winning end' would be those who plan and execute out each idea step by step and so the changes will not be as of a bigger impact when change appeared, compared to the other reckless opponent.
The responsibilty for changes is both no one's and everyone's. As stated before, change is both avoidable and unavoidable, depending on situations. For if one chooses to 'change', the other will have to accept the 'change' and follow (turning it into win-win situation), if not the person who doesnt want to 'change', it will be a lose-win situation, and it will be the person who cannot follow who so called 'loses' and fall back. Changes can also be caused by nature, therefore, my conclusion is changes is both no one's and everyone's responsibility.
Mak Wen Qi (10)